A bitter High Court dispute has broken out in between future neighbours in excess of the development of a wall at a coastal internet site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide focus pursuing an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed spouse and children house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental issues, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Periods article about René Collier and also the Irish Instances report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced into a very publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of building operates at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and an organization director respectively, seek out to construct their loved ones residence. The case happens to be emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever progress pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of set up residents. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting constructed by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted under scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their planning authorization by building a wall outside of the boundaries in their internet site, leading to an encroachment over a Special Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, therefore locations are issue to rigid controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have Long lasting ecological implications, specially inside a sensitive coastal ecosystem like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their preparing permission, and say the wall, that's partly built, is in the correct placement. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so as to maintain their perspective, an allegation that has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, where sights of The ocean are both equally really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular initiatives with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the website, In accordance with sworn evidence referenced in the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-substantial drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Moments, an image that has given that turn out to be emblematic of the depth on the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Collect Visible evidence of your wall’s placement relative to tidal lines and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Instances claimed, describing how the two Adult males entered the drinking water all through critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm water to photograph the internet site became Probably the most placing descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations report about accountant Paul Feely noted that these kinds of steps were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was getting encroached on.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being covered in detail from the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to be aware of the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court heard further more submissions on no matter whether interim orders should be granted to halt construction pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital instant in the lawful timeline.
Within the Main with the dispute is really a disagreement around boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain that the wall, as made, goes further than what was permitted and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, is referred to as meticulous in his examination of planning files, maps, and ailments attached to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two pressured that their motion is motivated by worry for environmental safety and adherence to planning legislation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private watch, insisting as an alternative that it's about making certain that development at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got described their extended-standing link to the region as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a couple just looking to build a family property in accordance Using the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches with a Particular Space of Conservation and say that all operates are actually carried out determined by Expert advice and accredited ideas. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, including entering the sea in the course of a storm, will not alter the underlying specifics.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how setting up disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than construction of wall at coastal website is now a shorthand description for any circumstance that lots of observers see as progressively widespread. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation concerning personal land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming extra contentious.
The Irish Periods short article about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in area advocacy on setting up and environmental concerns, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly distinct professional backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed Irish Times article about René Collier the internet site from your sea Irish Situations coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-superior water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments and René Collier waded as a result of waist-substantial h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Situations are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting both of those the physical reality in the coastline plus the symbolic nature from the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome remains unsure. The court docket will have to determine whether or not the wall as built complies with preparing permission and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and setting up problems. Nevertheless the human factor remains central: neighbours who must Are living along with each other long once the authorized expenses happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of building works at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the situation lengthen beyond that handle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. Additionally, it underscores how immediately a local disagreement can escalate when elementary problems which include environmental safety and assets rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of normal elegance and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre from the dispute stands partly built, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. Regardless of whether it will eventually in the end be altered, eradicated, or finished as planned will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will very likely go on to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most carefully viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin recently.